Originally Published: June 15, 2026
When I was a junior software developer, I once checked in code around the same time as a senior team member. As usual, the automated system triggered a project-wide rebuild and basic test. It failed. We all received the notification and knew it came from the two of us.
With an anxious but calm curiosity, I immediately dove into the root cause. I knew I had run my unit tests thoroughly, so I was genuinely eager to see what the unit tests might have missed. In that moment, my focus was entirely on finding the solution; there was no room for ego or worry about whose code was at fault.
Across the hall, however, a different energy unfolded. The senior engineer stood at a coworker’s doorway, complaining loudly, fully convinced the failure was mine. His words carried directly into my space. I tried to tune it out. The coworker gently tried to guide him inside her office to close the door, but the atmosphere already felt heavy, leaving me feeling intimidated and disappointed.
Yet, on my screen, the debugger was already running. I was staring at a specific keyword: continue.
In C++ programming, continue is used inside a loop. Unlike a break statement—which completely stops and exits the process—continue skips the remaining code in the current iteration and forces the system to jump to the next cycle. It refuses to stop; it simply bypasses the immediate disruption to keep moving forward.
Another senior engineer stepped into my office, and I showed him what I was looking at. Moments later, the engineer who had been projecting the blame approached, perhaps realizing we were talking about the root cause. I showed him what caused the problem. It was in his new code. He defended that he had misinterpreted continue, redefining it in his own way.
We can continue pushing forward with what we think or want people to think, but if it is not aligned with a shared standard or common understanding, it will inevitably break the shared work.
When people feign empathy but insult others behind their backs, they lack genuine self-satisfaction and confidence. Confidence and happiness are built on knowing you possess empathy, because it connects you not only to yourself but to all of humanity.
— Chapter 20: Section "Recollection of an Old Story for a New Conclusion"
The deeper lesson I walked away with that day wasn't about programming. It was about energy. When we focus purely on finding a solution, we don't waste energy on speculation, gossip, or blame. By refusing to absorb the emotional exhaustion of the noise around me, I was able to stay aligned with myself. I was able to unlock an inner strength—not to defend my ego, but to solve the shared problem—even when it meant solving others'.
May we all find the right way to continue our journey, bypassing the noise, and unlocking the internal strength to keep building together.
Warmly,
Voice for Empathy
Voice for Empathy — Building bridges through understanding.
Powerful Empathy — Exploring the foundational story behind the mission.